DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture 代写
100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129
DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture 代写
History of Interior Architecture
DIA1000 04 4
Knoll Showroom, San Francisco, designed by Florence Knoll, 1954
Semester 2, 2017
Teaching Staff:
Dolores O’Grady
Daniel Huppatz
1
1
DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture – Semester 2 2017
Lecture Program Thursdays 1:30-2:30 Room: AGSE 207
Week 1: Thursday 3 August
Lecture: INTRODUCTION: HISTORY OF INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE
Tutorial: What is history? What is interior architecture?
Reading: Sanders, “Curtain Wars”
Week 2: Thursday 10 August
Lecture: INTERIORITY
Tutorial: What is interiority?
Reading: Hartzell, “The Velvet Touch” and Benjamin, “Louis-Philippe or the Interior”
Week 3: Thursday 17 August
Lecture: DWELLING
Tutorial: What is the relationship between humans and space?
Reading: Heidegger, “Building, Dwelling, Thinking”
Week 4: Thursday 24 August
Lecture: SACRED SPACE – Guest lecture by Flavia Marcello
Tutorial: What is sacred space? What is its relationship with geometry?
Reading: Vitruvius, from the “Ten Books of Architecture”, Unwin, “Ideal Geometry”
Week 5: Thursday 31 August
Lecture: HOUSE I: THE DOMESTIC INTERIOR
Tutorial: What is privacy? What is comfort?
Reading: Rybczynski, from Home: the Short History of an Idea
Week 6: Thursday 7 September
Lecture: TRADITIONS: NATIONAL, REGIONAL, LOCAL
Tutorial: How do interior spaces reflect social and political identities?
Readings: Jackson & Barnes, “A Significant Mirror of Progress”, Woolley,
“Australianness and Regionalism”
MID-SEMESTER BREAK (Monday 11 Sept – Friday 15 Sept)
2
2
Week 7: Thursday 21 September
Lecture: POLITICAL SPACE – Guest lecture by Flavia Marcello
Tutorial: How is power enacted in interior spaces?
Reading: Dovey, “Power”, from Framing Places
Week 8: Thursday 28 September
Lecture: TRADITIONS: CULTURAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL
Tutorial: How do different cultures understand interior space?
Readings: Tanizaki, from In Praise of Shadows, Kashiwagi, “On Rationalisation and
the National Lifestyle”
Week 9: Thursday 5 October
Lecture: HOUSE II: MEANING, SYMBOLISM AND NARRATIVES
Tutorial: What is the meaning of home?
Readings: Bachelard, from The Poetics of Space, Sparke, “The Private Interior”
Week 10: Thursday 12 October
Lecture: INDIGENOUS SPACE
Tutorial: How do indigenous cultures understand interior space?
Reading: Memmott, “The Way it Was: Customary Camps and Houses”, Jangala,
“Malikijarrakurlu” (The Two Dogs)
Week 11: Thursday 19 October
Lecture: HOUSE III: A MACHINE FOR LIVING IN
Tutorial: What was modernism?
Readings: Breuer, “The House Interior”, Fredrick, “The Labor-Saving Kitchen”
Week 12: Thursday 26 October
Lecture: MATERIALITY AND EXPERIENCE
Tutorial: How do materials affect our experience of interior space?
Reading: Pallasmaa, “An Architecture of the Seven Senses”
3
3
GENERAL NOTES ON THIS UNIT
Lectures are delivered live each Thursday between 1:30 and 2:30 in AGSE 207 but tutorials
will be conducted online at specific times on Thursday afternoons or Fridays – your specific
time is on your timetable. You need not be physically on campus to participate in these
online tutorials but you will need to be online for the full two hours. The overall success of
this unit relies on your weekly participation in the online discussion threads and activities.
This is your chance to reflect upon the lecture content and readings as well as your fellow
students’ ideas. Each week, you are be expected to post replies to a discussion board in
response to short tasks as well as add additional ideas, images, videos or web links relevant
to the weekly topic. You must also respond to your fellow students’ posts. Remember, the
more involved you get in discussions, the more dynamic and interesting our classes will be.
ASSESSMENT
1. Online Debate – 30% of semester’s grade
Submission Date: Wednesday 30 August by 5pm
Submission: An illustrated 1500 word essay, submitted on Blackboard
In weeks 2-4 of semester, we will be covering three “foundational” themes: Interiority,
Dwelling, and Sacred Space. For this piece of assessment, you are to take ONE of these
themes and form an original argument around one of the tutorial questions:
- Interiority: What is interiority?
- Dwelling: What is the relationship between humans and space?
- Sacred Space: What is a sacred space?
To frame your argument, use either two precedents that we have discussed in class or two
precedents that you have sourced from Ching, Jarzombek and Prakash’s A Global History of
Architecture (see bibliography for details). As in a debate, your discussion of these two
examples should provide two different (though not necessarily opposing) perspectives on
this question. Focus your analysis of these examples on their interiors and remember to
incorporate references to both the relevant weekly readings as well as additional research.
Include diagrams tor images to illustrate your ideas. See books by Simon Unwin in the
bibliography for examples of how to do this. Start reading and researching early to avoid last
minute panic!
4
4
DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture 代写
ONLINE DEBATE: Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Fail - N Pass - P Credit - C Distinction - D
High Distinction -
HD
Overall
argument
Weight
25.00%
0 to 49 %
No coherent
introduction,
conclusion or
overall
argument.
50 to 59 %
Attempt at a
introduction,
conclusion and
overall argument
with some
reference to the
examples.
60 to 69 %
Coherent
introduction and
conclusion.
Attempt at an
argument with
some references to
the examples.
70 to 79 %
Clear introduction
and conclusion.
Logical argument
backed up with
examples.
80 to 100 %
Clear and original
introduction and
conclusion. Strong,
logical argument
backed up with
examples.
Precedent
analysis
Weight
25.00%
0 to 49 %
Little analysis,
little or no
evidence of any
research.
50 to 59 %
Attempt at an
analysis of the
spaces, some
research.
60 to 69 %
Reasonable analysis
of the spaces,
reasonable
research mostly
appropriately used.
70 to 79 %
Good analysis of
the spaces, good
research
appropriately
documented.
80 to 100 %
Original analysis of
the spaces,
evidence of strong
research
documented and
synthesized from
various sources.
Use of
images/plans
Weight
20.00%
0 to 49 %
Minimal images,
poor quality, no
reference to
them in the
text.
50 to 59 %
Includes images
and/or plans,
some reference to
them in the text.
60 to 69 %
Good quality
graphics and/or
plans, some
reference to them
in the text.
70 to 79 %
Good quality
graphics and/or
plans, captioned
and referenced in
the text.
80 to 100 %
Original and high-
quality graphics
and plans, clearly
captioned and
integrated into the
text.
Written
expression
and structure
Weight
20.00%
0 to 49 %
Unclear
expression, no
logical
structure.
50 to 59 %
Readable, attempt
at a coherent
structure.
60 to 69 %
Reasonable
structure and
expression.
70 to 79 %
Logical structure,
good expression,
and mostly
original writing.
80 to 100 %
Logical structure,
formal academic
expression,
engaging and
original writing.
Research
Weight
10.00%
0 to 49 %
No evidence of
any research.
50 to 59 %
Only set texts
and/or online
sources.
60 to 69 %
Use of some
external sources,
mostly correctly
referenced.
70 to 79 %
Use of a variety of
sources, correctly
referenced.
80 to 100 %
Coverage of
extensive and
appropriate
sources, correctly
referenced.
5
5
2. Weekly Lecture Blog – 40% of semester’s grade
Submission Date: Every Friday by 5pm from weeks 5-12
Submission: 8 blog entries, submitted to the Blackboard Weekly Reading Blog
Each week during semester, one or two readings will provide a focus for our lecture and
tutorials. For this assessment task, you are to submit a critical analysis of the weekly
reading(s) from week 5 to week 12 on your own individual blog within Blackboard. This is 8
weeks’ worth of blog entries (so each is worth 5% of your grade). Your entry should
comprise both a critical analysis of the reading(s) as well as at least one supporting image
(which might be an example discussed in the reading or one you have found/created
yourself). In any case you MUST acknowledge the source of this image and caption it
accordingly. It should not be the first image that appears on Google Image Search, it should
help support your argument. Your blog entry should reflect on the position of the writer (who
has written the piece – a historian? an architect? a philosopher?), the main argument or
points discussed by the author, what insight it has given you into the history of interiors, and
how it might relate to your studio or other projects. Each entry need not be long (500 words
maximum) but should display an engagement with the readings and ideas discussed in
lectures and tutorials each week. Given these blogs will be open to everyone in this unit, you
must also regularly read others’ blogs and comment on them.
6
6
WEEKLY LECTURE BLOG: Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Fail - N Pass - P Credit - C Distinction - D High Distinction - HD
Ideas and
Content
Weight
30.00%
0 to 49 %
Simple posts,
lacking insight and
depth. Entries are
short and frequently
irrelevant to the
readings.
50 to 59 %
Posts show some
insight, depth and
connection to the
readings. Limited
understanding of each
week's topic.
60 to 69 %
Posts display good
insight and depth.
The content of each
is connected to the
readings and
examples discussed.
70 to 79 %
DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture 代写
Posts display insight,
depth and
understanding. All
posts are relevant and
expressed in an
appropriate style.
80 to 100 %
Posts display excellent
insight, depth and
understanding. All
entries reference
appropriate research
and examples.
Quality
Weight
20.00%
0 to 49 %
Posts are poor
quality, missing
and/or late. Little
evidence of any
reading or engaging
with the weekly
topic.
50 to 59 %
Posts are consistent,
but the writing is
casual with a lack of
engagement with the
readings.
60 to 69 %
Posts are clearly
written and attempt
to engage with the
readings and topic
for each week.
70 to 79 %
Posts are well written
and demonstrate good
engagement with the
readings and weekly
topics.
80 to 100 %
Posts are well written,
and display evidence of
strong understanding
of the readings as well
as original reflections.
Voice
Weight
20.00%
0 to 49 %
Posts do not reflect
an awareness of the
audience nor is
there any
personality evident.
50 to 59 %
Posts reflect a little
personality but the
word choices do not
bring the topic to life.
60 to 69 %
Posts are written in
an appropriate tone
and an attempt is
made at a consistent
voice.
70 to 79 %
Posts are written in an
appropriate style, the
voice is consistent and
engaging.
80 to 100 %
Posts are written in a
consistent and
engaging style, the
voice is original and the
tone expressive.
Graphics
Weight
25.00%
0 to 49 %
Little to no use of
images or only low-
quality images
without captions or
annotations.
50 to 59 %
Selection of images
variable with some
good quality and
some poor quality.
Some captions and
annotations.
60 to 69 %
Good selection of
images or other
multi-media, most
display appropriate
captions or
annotations.
70 to 79 %
Good selection of
images or other multi-
media, all display
appropriate captions
or annotations.
80 to 100 %
Thoughtful selection of
images and other
multi-media to
enhance the text.
Excellent integration of
images and text.
Citations
Weight
5.00%
0 to 49 %
No citations to
either images or
published works.
50 to 59 %
Some images or
written texts are
appropriately cited in
some posts.
60 to 69 %
Images and written
texts are
appropriately cited in
most posts.
70 to 79 %
Images and written
texts are appropriately
cited.
80 to 100 %
Images and written
texts are appropriately
cited.
7
DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture 代写
7
3. Online Exam – 30% of semester’s grade
Date: Wednesday November 1 – Friday November 3 (Week 13)
The exam will take the form of an online, “open book” exam on Blackboard that you may
take any time between Wednesday November 1 and Friday November 3. While it will only
take approximately an hour to complete, you may complete the exam at any time during
those three days. The exam will test your knowledge and understanding of the main themes
and ideas we have covered this semester in the lecture program, the readings and in class
discussions. The best way to study for this exam is to keep up with the weekly readings and
tasks during semester, and then to review them again in the week or two before the exam.
Of course, any additional reading you do on the topics covered during semester will help
familiarise you with the exam material. You could begin with some of the titles below.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
History of Interior Design and Architecture: General Resources
Abercrombie, S. 2003. A Century of Interior Design 1900–2000. New York: Rizzoli.
Alfoldy, S. and Helland, J. 2008. Craft, Space and Interior Design: 1855-2005. Altershot:
Ashgate.
Brooker, G. and Stone, S. eds. 2012. From Organisation to Decoration: An Interior Design
Reader, New York: Routledge.
Ching, F. D. K., Jarzombek, M.M. and Prakash, V. 2011. A Global History of
Architecture, 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Fisher, F., Keeble, T., Lara-Betancourt, P. and Martin, B., eds., 2011. Performance, Fashion
and the Modern Interior, Oxford and New York: Berg.
Ireland, J. 2009. History of Interior Design. New York: Fairchild Books.
Massey, A. 1990. Interior Design since 1900. London: Thames & Hudson.
McKellar, S. and Sparke, P. 2004. Interior Design and Identity. Manchester: Manchester
University Press.
Pile, J. and Gura, J. 2013. A History of Interior Design, 4th edn. London: Lawrence King.
Poldma, Tiiu, ed., 2013. Meanings of Designed Spaces, New York: Fairchild Books.
Rice. C. 2007. The Emergence of the Interior: Architecture, Modernity, Domesticity. London
and New York: Routledge.
Sparke, P. 2008. The Modern Interior. London: Reaktion Books.
Sparke, P., Massey, A., Keeble, T. and Martin, B., eds. 2009. Designing the Modern Interior:
from the Victorians to Today, Oxford and New York: Berg.
Taylor, M. and Preston, J. eds. 2006. Intimus: Interior Design Theory Reader. Chichester,
England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Academy.
Taylor, M., ed. 2013. Interior Design and Architecture: Critical and Primary Sources (4
Volumes), London: Bloomsbury.
Unwin, S., Analysing Architecture, Routledge, London, 2009 (see companion website at:
http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415489287/)
Unwin, S., Exercises in Architecture, Routledge, London, 2012 (see companion website at:
http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415489287/)
Unwin, S., Twenty Buildings Every Architect Should Understand, Routledge, London, 2010
Weinthal, L., 2011. Toward a New Interior: An Anthology of Interior Design Theory. New
8
8
York: Princeton Architectural Press.
WHAT IS INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE?
Sanders, J. 2002. “Curtain Wars”, Harvard Design Review, issue 16:
http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/16/curtain-wars
Abercrombie, S. 1990. Philosophy of Interior Design. New York: Harper & Row.
Lefebvre, H., 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Rice, C. 2004. “Rethinking Histories of the Interior”, Journal of Architecture, 9:3, 275-287.
DWELLING
Heidegger, M. 2011. Basic Writings, Routledge, London.
Norberg-Schulz, C. 1979. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, New
York: Rizzoli.
Sharr, Adam 2007, Heidegger for architects, Routledge, London
SACRED SPACE
Vitruvius, The Ten Books of Architecture – full text available at Project Gutenberg.
Kostof, Spiro 2010, A history of architecture: settings and rituals, International 2nd ed,
Oxford University Press, New York
HOUSE I: THE DOMESTIC INTERIOR
Blunt, A. and Dowling, R. 2006, Home, Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, NJ.
Parissien, S. 2009. Interiors: The Home Since 1700. London: Lawrence King.
Rybczynski, W. 1986. Home: the Short History of an Idea, Penguin, London and New York.
TRADITIONS: NATIONAL, REGIONAL, LOCAL (AUSTRALIA)
Avery, T. 2007. “Furniture Design and Colonialism: Negotiating Relationships between
Britain and Australia, 1880-1901”, Home Cultures, 4:1, 69-92.
Boyd, R. Australia’s Home: Its Origins, Builders and Occupiers, Melbourne University Press,
Melbourne, 1952.
Stephen, A., McNamara, A., and Goad, P. 2006. Modernism and Australia: Documents on
Art, Design and Architecture 1917-1967, The Miegunyah Press, Melbourne.
TRADITIONS: CULTURAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL (JAPAN)
Daniels, I. 2010. The Japanese House: Material Culture in the Modern Home. Oxford
and New York: Berg.
Kashiwagi, H. 2000. On Rationalization and the National Lifestyle: Japanese Design of
the 1920s and 1930s. In Tipton E. and Clark, J. Being Modern in Japan: Culture and
Society from the 1910s to the 1930s. Canberra: Humanities Research Foundation.
Sand, Jordan. 2005. House and Home in Modern Japan: Architecture, Domestic Space, and
Bourgeois Culture, 1880-1930. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center.
Teasley, Sarah. 2003. Furnishing the Modern Metropolitan: Moriya Nobuo’s Designs for
Domestic Interiors, 1922-1927. Design Issues 19:4, 57-71.
HOUSE II: MEANING, SYMBOLISM AND NARRATIVES
Bachelard, G. 1994 (1958). The Poetics of Space. Trans. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Sparke, P. 2008. The Modern Interior. London: Reaktion Books.
9
9
Sparke, P., Massey, A., Keeble, T. and Martin, B., eds. 2009. Designing the Modern Interior:
from the Victorians to Today, Oxford and New York: Berg.
INDIGENOUS SPACE
Memmott, P., ed. 2003. Housing Design In Indigenous Australia, Royal Australian Institute of
Architects, Canberra.
Memmott, P. 2007. Gunyah, Goondie + Wurley: the Aboriginal Architecture of Australia,
University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, Qld.
Read, P., ed. 2000, Settlement: A History of Australian Indigenous Housing, Aboriginal
Studies Press, Canberra.
POLITICAL SPACE
Dovey, K. 1999. Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form, Routledge, London.
Ellin, N. ed. 1997. Architecture of Fear, Princeton Architecture Press, New York.
Jones, P. 2011. The Sociology of Architecture: Constructing Identities, Liverpool University
Press, Liverpool.
Marcello, F., “Italians do it Better: Fascist Italy’s New Brand of Nationalism in the Art and
Architecture of the Italian Pavilion, Paris 1937” in Rika Devos, Alexander Ortenberg, Vladimir
Paperny eds., Architecture of Great Expositions 1937-1958: Reckoning with the Global War,
Ashgate Press, 2015, 51-69.
HOUSE III: A MACHINE FOR LIVING IN
Colomina, B. 1998. Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media. Cambridge,
MA, and London: The MIT Press.
Sparke, P. 2008. The Modern Interior. London: Reaktion Books.
Sparke, P. et al, eds. 2009. Designing the Modern Interior: From the Victorians to Today.
London and New York: Berg Publishers.
Le Corbusier. 1986. Towards a New Architecture. New York: Dover Publications.
MATERIALITY AND EXPERIENCE
Bachelard, G. 1994 (1958). The Poetics of Space. Trans. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.
De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Holl, S., Pallasmaa, J. and Perez-Gomez, A. 1994. Questions of Perception:
Phenomenology of Architecture. Tokyo: A+U Publications.
Pallasmaa, J. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chitchester:
Wiley and Sons.
Tuan, Y. 1979. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
JOURNALS: access through the Swinburne Library website
Interiors (Bloomsbury Publishers)
Home Cultures (Bloomsbury Publishers)
Journal of Interior Design (Wiley Publishers)
IDEA (Interior Design Educators Association) journal
Architectural Theory Review (Routledge)
The Journal of Architecture (Routledge)
Grey Room (MIT Press)
Space and Culture (Sage Publishers)
DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture 代写
