MGT3SMG - Strategic Management 代写

100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129

MGT3SMG - Strategic Management 代写

La Trobe Business School

SUBJECT TITLE

MGT3SMG

Subject Learning Guide

Semester 1

2017

All Instances

Subject Coordinator: Dr Bret Slade

Academic Staff – Bendigo:

Dr Bret Slade

Academic Staff – Bundoora:

Mr Eshan Arya

Ms Ana Delevska

Ms Sunalini Arya

Academic Staff – Chisholm Dandenong:

TBA

La Trobe University

Table of Contents

SUBJECT DETAILS 3

GENERAL DETAILS 3

ENROLMENT REQUIREMENTS 3

STAFF CONTACTS 3

SUBJECT DESCRIPTION 3

SUBJECT INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES (SILOS) 3

LATROBE ESSENTIALS 3

GRADUATE CAPABILITIES 4

LEARNING ACTIVITY SUMMARY 4

ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK SUMMARY 4

LEARNING RESOURCES 4

STUDENT FEEDBACK ON SUBJECT SURVEY 5

SUMMARY OF SFS FEEDBACK FROM LAST YEAR 5

POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 6

A CADEMIC I NTEGRITY 6

E XTENSIONS , L ATE S UBMISSIONS AND P ENALTIES 6

R ULES - C OLLEGE /S CHOOL /D ISCIPLINE - SPECIFIC INFORMATION 7

S TUDENT C OMPLAINT 7

S TUDENT L EARNING U NIT (SL) 7

L EARNING M ANAGEMENT S YSTEM (LMS) 7

L IBRARY 7

S TUDENT S UPPORT S ERVICES 8

P EER L EARNING A DVISERS 8

R ESOURCES - C OLLEGE /S CHOOL /D ISCIPLINE - SPECIFIC INFORMATION 8

SCHEDULE OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES 9

S ESSION P LAN 9

L EARNING A CTIVITY D ETAILS 10

L EARNING A CTIVITY - C OLLEGE /S CHOOL /D ISCIPLINE - SPECIFIC I NFORMATION 10

ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK DETAILS 11

D ETAILED G RADING C RITERIA 13

A SSESSMENT AND F EEDBACK - C OLLEGE /S CHOOL /D ISCIPLINE - SPECIFIC INFORMATION 14

La Trobe University

Subject Details

GENERAL DETAILS

Subject Code: MGT3SMG Subject Title: Strategic Management

Teaching Period: Semester 1, 2016 Location(s):

BE BU DN

Credit Points: 15 Mode: Blended Level: 3

ENROLMENT REQUIREMENTS

Prerequisites: Successful completion of MGT1FOM OR BUS1BUF

Co-requisites: None

Incompatibles: None

Assumed Skills & Knowledge: English Literacy. Foundation knowledge from MGT3SMG and BUS1BUF

Special Study Requirements: If you have any special needs you are encouraged to consult with the Equality and

Diversity Centre (EDC). Further information and contact details for the EDC are available

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/equality

STAFF CONTACTS

Role Campus Name Email Telephone Room

Subject Coordinator

BE Dr Bret Slade b.slade@latrobe.edu.au 7248 B1.37

SUBJECT DESCRIPTION

MGT3SMG provides students with a comprehensive understanding of techniques and models applied in organisations to ensure sustainable

competitive advantage. This involves application of key theories to decisions and actions taken by an organisation's senior management team

to devise a long-term plan with the intention of developing the organisation's core competencies and increasing the organisation's

competitiveness. Key topics in this subject include; understanding the dynamics of the internal and external environments, Value Chain

Analysis, the 5 Forces Model, corporate level strategy, business level strategy, modes of entry into domestic and international markets,

propensity to innovate and level of competition and corporate governance. The focus will be on developing the ability of students to

understand, evaluate and effectively apply strategic management knowledge to modern organisations.

SUBJECT INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES (SILOS)

Upon successful completion of this subject, you should be able to :

Upon completion of the subject, students should be able to analyse the conceptual, theoretical and practical knowledge of Strategic

Management in the context of contemporary organisations.

Upon completion of the subject, students should be able to apply the theoretical models of strategic management to work-base practices

in the context of contemporary organisations.

Upon completion of the subject, students should be able to demonstrate the practical application of ethics principles to planning,

development, and implementation of Strategic Management in the context of contemporary organisations.

Upon completion of the subject, students should be able to demonstrate the practical application of Strategic Management to work-based

practices in the context of contemporary organisations.

Upon completion of the subject, students should be able to distinguish between major processes involved in developing strategic planning

and development in the context of contemporary organisations.

6 Upon completion of the subject, students should prove the capacity to learn independently and effectively in the context of the discipline.

LATROBE ESSENTIALS

The following Essentials are evaluated in this subject:

La Trobe University

Essentials Assessment Task

1 Global Citizenship Not evaluated

2 Innovation and Entrepreneurship Not evaluated

3 Sustainability Thinking Not evaluated

GRADUATE CAPABILITIES

The following Graduate Capabilities (GCs) are evaluated in this subject:

Key Element Level of Instruction

WR Writing Extension/Expansion

QL Quantitative Literacy Extension/Expansion

IR Inquiry Research Extension/Expansion

CT Critical Thinking Extension/Expansion

CP Creative Problem Solving Extension/Expansion

EB Ethical Behaviour Extension/Expansion

DS Discipline Specific Knowledge and Skills Extension/Expansion

LEARNING ACTIVITY SUMMARY

Learning Activity: Schedule

Online Lectures Weeks 1-8

Face-to-Face 1.5 hour Seminars Weeks 1-8

Further information is available at http://www.latrobe.edu.au/timetable/

ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK SUMMARY

Assessment Tasks: Due Date SILOs GCs % Comments

Assessment Task 1: Individual Authentic

Learning Case-Study Assignment 1500

words

11:55pm, 31 March 2017 01 WR/CT/IR

/CP

30 Results released during

semester. This item will

report on the Graduate

Capability of Critical

Thinking.

Assessment Task 2: Individual Authentic

Research Portfolio (Quantitative

Literacy Case Study) 1500 words

11:55pm, 28 April 2017

02,04 WR/QL/DS/E

B/IR/CP

30 Results released during

semester. This assessment

will report on the

Graduate Capabilities of

Quantitative Literacy and

Discipline-specific

knowledge and skills.

Assessment Task 3: Individual or Group

Combined Research Portfolio 2000

words per student. 5 students per group

(max).

11:55pm, 26 May 2017 03 WR/QL/DS

/EB/IR/CP

40 Results not released

during semester. This item

will report on the

Graduate Capability of

Inquiry/Research

LEARNING RESOURCES

Reading Type Title Author and Year Publisher

Core Text Strategic Management:

Competitiveness and

Author/s: Dallas Hanson,

Michael A. Hitt, R. Duane

Cengage Learning Australia

ISBN 9780170227643

La Trobe University

Globalisation, 5th Asia-Pacific

edition.

Ireland, Robert E. Hoskisson.

2014

STUDENT FEEDBACK ON SUBJECT SURVEY

The Student Feedback on Subjects (SFS) Survey is part of the quality assurance process that occurs across the university. In

this survey you are invited to tell us about your learning experiences in this subject. We want you to tell us of your

experience in this subject. Your views will be taken seriously and will assist us to enhance this subject for the next group of

students. Your feedback will also contribute to the text for ‘Summary of Previous Student Feedback’ below so please take the

time to tell us your views. The surveys are anonymous and will be distributed prior to the end of the teaching period.

For information on Student Feedback on Subjects refer to:

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/leadership-volunteering/speak-up/subjects-teaching

SUMMARY OF SFS FEEDBACK FROM LAST YEAR

Students found the delivery and assessment of MGT3SMG to be satisfactory.

Modifications have been made to enable students to work individually on all assignments.

The external examination has been replaced with a research portfolio.

The assignments have been focussed on specific discipline related knowledge areas.

La Trobe University

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines

The University has a comprehensive policy framework to which both staff and students must adhere. You should familiarise

yourself with those policies, procedures and guidelines likely to affect you especially the following:

 Academic Integrity

 Academic Progress

 Assessment and Feedback

 Extension to Submission Dates

 Late Submission of Assessment Tasks

 Occupational, Health and Safety [OHS]

 Privacy

 Special Consideration

 Student Charter

 Use of Electronic Mail

The relevant policies, procedures and guidelines can be found on the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/policy/

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity means being honest in academic work and taking responsibility for learning the conventions of scholarship.

La Trobe University views this seriously as evidenced by the following extract:

Academic honesty is a fundamental principle in teaching, learning, research and scholarship. The University

requires its academic staff and students to observe the highest ethical standards in all aspects of academic

work and it demonstrates its commitment to these values by awarding due credit for honestly conducted

scholarly work, and by penalising academic misconduct and all forms of cheating.

Academic Integrity Procedures (2012, p. 1 of 6)

Academic misconduct includes improper referencing, plagiarism, copying and cheating. You should familiarise yourself with

your responsibilities in relation to Academic Integrity and if you have any questions, direct them to your Course Coordinator.

Information can be found on the website at: www.latrobe.edu.au/students/academic-integrity

All hard copy assignments should be accompanied by the Academic Integrity Assignment Declaration Form available at:

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/711152/Assignment-Declaration-Form.pdf.

For assistance with referencing visit http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/academic-integrity/referencing-help

Special Consideration

Special Consideration is the term used to describe a process that applies an equity measure to ensure that where any temporary

adverse circumstances beyond the control of a student, that impact negatively on that student’s ability to demonstrate their

learning achievement for an assessment task, is taken into account.

Eligibility to apply for Special Consideration does not automatically imply eligibility to receive it. Certain criteria must be

satisfied in order to receive Special Consideration.

Please refer to the relevant policies, procedures and guidelines website athttp://www.latrobe.edu.au/policy/

Submission of special consideration applications for assignments, mid-semester tests and final examinations should be made

online at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/special-consideration

Extensions, Late Submissions and Penalties

There are policies and procedures to guarantee fair, consistent and transparent treatment of late submission of assessment

tasks provide equity around extensions to submission dates and penalties associated with not submitting assessment by the due

date and time.

The University requires fair, consistent and transparent treatment of late submission of assessment tasks. The procedure for late

submission is documented in the Late Submission of Assessment Tasks document (Ref. no. 112027D). It states:

The standard penalty for late submission of assessment tasks is 5% of the marks for that task for each delay

in submission of a day or partial day up to a maximum of five (5) working days after the due date.

Assessment tasks will not be accepted after the earlier of the following occurrences:

La Trobe University

 The fifth (5th) working day after the due date; or

 Feedback on the assessment task has been returned to any student by the Teaching Team member.

These penalties apply only to individual assessment tasks worth 15% or more of the total assessment for the

subject. Late submission of take home examinations is not permitted.

Submission of special consideration applications for assignments, mid-semester tests and final examinations should be

made online at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/?a=668155.

Please refer to the relevant policies, procedures and guidelines website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/policy/

Rules - College/School/Discipline-specific information

Not applicable to this subject.

Student Complaint

La Trobe University is committed to an effective complaints handling mechanism for students in line with its policy of creating a

harmonious and productive study environment. Feedback stemming from student complaints is a valuable source of information

that helps the University improve the quality of its service.

You should lodge a complaint if:

 you are unhappy about something specific in your academic life (eg not enough seating in a lecture, staff not available

during office hours, cancelled lectures...)

 you don't think 'the rules' (university policy or procedure) are being followed

 a university staff member has been rude or their behaviour to you was inappropriate

 you have a dispute about a process used during an appeal

 you have reported something to I&O, security or academic staff and you have not received a response after a

reasonable amount of time

 you are a victim of bullying or harassment

For more information on student complaint process and to lodge a formal complaint visit:

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/complaints

Student Learning Unit (SL)

The Student Learning Unit (SL) works closely with teaching staff in the Schools and on the Melbourne and regional campuses to

ensure that all La Trobe students – including those from non-English-speaking backgrounds – develop high-level academic

speaking, writing, reading, and numeracy skills required for successful learning in their courses. For further information, please

see the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/learning/

Learning Management System (LMS)

The Learning Management System (LMS) is an Internet based system which allows you access to learning materials and to

interact with other students and teaching staff in activities related to your studies from any location with Internet access. Most

subjects have a LMS site into which you are automatically added as part of your enrolment into the subject.

The LMS can be accessed at: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/lms/login/ by using your Username and Password provided to you on

your Statement of Account. If you are having trouble accessing the LMS or want to find out more about LMS, please see the

website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/it/teaching/lms

Library

Your Library offers many ways to support your study. Play Library Quest lib.latrobe.edu.au/libraryquest to discover more about

how we can help, or visit our website and explore these essential resources:

 Achieve@ Uni [latrobe.edu.au/students/support/achieve] – learn important skills needed at university, includes

finding and using information in your assessment tasks, referencing, reading, writing and presenting, academic

language, and maths skills;

 Assignment Calculator [latrobe.edu.au/library/assignment-thesis-support/assignment-calculator] – plan your

assignment schedule and submit on time;

La Trobe University

 Referencing [latrobe.libguides.com/referencing] - understand why and how we reference, includes the four major

styles;

 Expert Help [latrobe.libguides.com] – provides expert discipline and specialist help; get help here with assessment

tasks;

 Live chat to library staff [lib.latrobe.edu.au/chat] – live chat for help; during semester hours only;

Student Support Services

If you have special needs due to disability or other factors the Equality and Diversity Centre can provide advice and support.

This Centre can be contacted by telephone on (03) 9479 2900 (Melbourne); (03) 5444 7410 (Bendigo); (02) 6024 9628 (Albury-

Wodonga); National Relay Service Deaf and Hearing Impaired: T: 133677 (within Australia only). Email:

Equality@latrobe.edu.au or refer to the website at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/support .

Peer Learning Advisers

Peer Learning Advisers (PLAs) are experienced students who can help you with assignment and thesis writing, maths and

statistics and other academic skills. PLAs are friendly and approachable and come from many disciplines; e.g. health sciences,

business or education. Their drop-in service is available at these campuses: Bundoora, Bendigo, Albury-Wodonga, Mildura and

Shepparton. Their timetable is available online: latrobe.edu.au/students/learning/drop-in-learning-support.

Resources - College/School/Discipline-specific information

Not applicable to this subject.

La Trobe University

Schedule of Learning Activities

Session Plan

Week Topic Activity Resources SILOs GCs

Strategic

Management and

Strategic

Competitiveness

Seminar and

Introduction

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch1

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

The external

environment.

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch2

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

The internal

organisation.

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch3

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Business Level

Strategy

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

MGT3SMG - Strategic Management 代写

Ch4

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Competitive Rivalry

and Competitive

Dynamics

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch5

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Corporate Level

Strategy

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 11 th ed

Ch6

ISBN 9780170227643

2, 3 a, c, d,

Merger and

acquisition strategies

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch7

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

17 Semester Break

International

Strategy

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch8

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Co-operative

Strategy

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch9

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Corporate

Governance

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch10

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Organisational

Structure and

Controls

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

Ch11

ISBN 9780170227643

1, 2, 3 a, b, c,

d, e, f

Strategic Leadership

Seminar and Case

Study

Hitt et al 5 th ed

ISBN 9780170227643

2, 3 a, c, d,

STUDY VACATION

CENTRAL

EXAMINATION

PERIOD

La Trobe University

Learning Activity Details

Times and rooms are subject to change. To view the full time and location details for learning activities in this subject, please

ensure you seek further information available at http://www.latrobe.edu.au/timetable/.

You should also regularly check [at least once per week] the subject’s LMS site (where applicable) for updated information.

Learning Activity - College/School/Discipline-specific Information

Not applicable to this subject.

La Trobe University

Assessment and Feedback Details

Assessment Task 1 Due Date % SILOs

Assessed

Individual Authentic Learning

Case-Study Assignment 1500

words

11:55pm,

31 March

2017

30 01 Results released during semester. This item will report on the

Graduate Capability of Critical Thinking.

Description of Task

Read the case study from the LMS Assessment Section.

Big Chocolate – Strategic Case Study Analysis

Submission Details

LMS Turn-it-In submission only

Grading Criteria and Feedback Criteria Weighting

1. Hurdle requirement Pass/Not Pass:

No Marks are awarded in this criterion.

a. The item has been presented in the medium of written

English. Sentences are structured and conform to academic writing

guidelines. The paper has an identifiable structure including an

introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper follows the

Harvard Referencing Style. The examiner can proceed with further

assessment.

b. The item has not been presented in the medium of written

English and the examiner cannot proceed with further assessment.

Sentences are not structured and do not conform to academic writing

guidelines. The paper does not have an identifiable structure including

an introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper does not

follow the Harvard Referencing Style.

2. The response examines the Big Chocolate

situation, with reference to both the core text and

the academic literature.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7.5-8 marks)

c. Effective (7-7.5 marks)

d. Adequate (5-6.5 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.5 marks)

3. The response details the effect of Porter’s Five

Forces within the Big Chocolate situation with

reference to both the core text and the academic

literature. This section has a total potential value

of 5 marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7.5-8 marks)

c. Effective (7-7.5 marks)

d. Adequate (5-6.5 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.5 marks)

4. The response provides a PESTEL describing the

country positioning in Big Chocolate. This section

has a total potential value of 5 marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7.5-8 marks)

c. Effective (7-7.5 marks)

d. Adequate (5-6.5 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.5 marks)

5. Examiner’s Comment. No marks are awarded in

this criterion.

Assessment Task 2 Due Date % SILOs

Assessed

Individual Authentic Learning

Research Portfolio (Quantitative

Literacy Case Study) 1500 words

11:55pm,

28 April

2017

30 02, 04 Results released during semester.

This assessment will report on the Graduate Capabilities of

Quantitative Literacy and Discipline-specific knowledge and skills.

Description of Task

La Trobe University

Read the case study from the LMS Assessment Section.

Provide a quantitative analysis of the selected case study using the

following structure:

1) Introduction

2) Background to the case

3) Quantitative Analysis of the Case

4) Summary of Findings

5) Conclusion

Submission Details

LMS Turn-it-In submission only

Grading Criteria and Feedback Criteria Weighting

1. Hurdle requirement Pass/Not Pass:

No Marks are awarded in this criterion.

a. The item has been presented in the medium of written

English. Sentences are structured and conform to academic writing

guidelines. The paper has an identifiable structure including an

introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper follows the

Harvard Referencing Style. The examiner can proceed with further

assessment.

b. The item has not been presented in the medium of written

English and the examiner cannot proceed with further assessment.

Sentences are not structured and do not conform to academic writing

guidelines. The paper does not have an identifiable structure including

an introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper does not

follow the Harvard Referencing Style.

2. The response provides background to the case. This section

has a total potential value of 10 marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7-7.8 marks)

c. Effective (6-6.8 marks)

d. Adequate (5-5.8 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.8 marks)

3. The response provides a quantitative analysis of the case.

This section has a total potential value of 10 marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7-7.8 marks)

c. Effective (6-6.8 marks)

d. Adequate (5-5.8 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.8 marks)

4. 9. The response provides a summary of findings. This section

has a total potential value of 10 marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7-7.8 marks)

c. Effective (6-6.8 marks)

d. Adequate (5-5.8 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.8 marks)

5. Examiner’s Comment. No marks are awarded in this

criterion.

Assessment Task 3 Due Date % SILOs

Assessed

Individual or Group Combined

Research Portfolio 2000 words

per student. 5 students per group

(max).

1:55pm, 26

May 2017

40 02, 04 Results not released during semester. This item will report on the

Graduate Capability of Inquiry/Research

Description of Task

La Trobe University

Read the case study from the LMS Assessment Section.

Research and respond to the questions on the case study using a

minimum of 10 academic peer reviewed journal articles. Your case

study response should include five (5) sections:

1) Introduction

2) Background to the case

3) PESTEL analysis of the case

4) Porter’s Five Forces analysis of the case

5) Recommended Business Level Strategy for resolving the case

6) Conclusion

Submission Details

LMS Turn-it-In submission only

Grading Criteria and Feedback Criteria Weighting

1. Hurdle requirement Pass/Not Pass:

No Marks are awarded in this criterion.

a. The item has been presented in the medium of written

English. Sentences are structured and conform to academic writing

guidelines. The paper has an identifiable structure including an

introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper follows the

Harvard Referencing Style. The examiner can proceed with further

assessment.

b. The item has not been presented in the medium of written

English and the examiner cannot proceed with further assessment.

Sentences are not structured and do not conform to academic writing

guidelines. The paper does not have an identifiable structure including

an introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper does not

follow the Harvard Referencing Style.

2. The response provides background to the case.

This section has a total potential value of 5 marks.

a. Comprehensive (4.5-5 marks)

b. Detailed (4-4.5 marks)

c. Effective (3.5-4 marks)

d. Adequate (2.5-3 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-2.5 marks)

3. The response provides a PESTEL analysis of the

case. This section has a total potential value of 5

marks.

a. Comprehensive (4.5-5 marks)

b. Detailed (4-4.5 marks)

c. Effective (3.5-4 marks)

d. Adequate (2.5-3 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-2.5 marks)

4. The response provides a five forces analysis of the

case. This section has a total potential value of 10

marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7-7.8 marks)

c. Effective (6-6.8 marks)

d. Adequate (5-5.8 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.8 marks)

5. 9. The response provides Business Level Strategic

recommendations for the case. This section has a

total potential value of 10 marks.

a. Comprehensive (8-10 marks)

b. Detailed (7-7.8 marks)

c. Effective (6-6.8 marks)

d. Adequate (5-5.8 marks)

e. Not Adequate (0-4.8 marks)

6. Examiner’s Comment. No marks are awarded in

this criterion.

Detailed Grading Criteria

Not applicable to this subject.

La Trobe University

Assessment and Feedback - College/School/Discipline-specific information

Not applicable to this subject.

MGT3SMG - Strategic Management 代写