Mix | Current – what the Brand and Sub-Brand is doing now. | Your Recommendation | Explain how your Recommendation will more-effectively support and communicate your Brand Positioning. |
Product | |||
Place | |||
Promotion | |||
Price |
Handy Hint; review the final draft of the Assignment and check off that all sections have been completed. Then check your Written Expression (5 marks) and Referencing (5 marks) for extensive in-text citation plus List of References.
|
How to get higher grades; See what you have to do better,and what extra things you have to do to get higher grades.White-on-Blue = extra to get a Credit over a Pass,Grey BOLD = extra to get a D compared with a C,Yellow BOLD Italic underlined = extra to get an HD compared with a D. |
|||||
Rubric for Assignment 4: Marketing Strategy | |||||
Criteria |
Fail |
Pass 50-59% |
Credit 60-69% |
Distinction 70-79% |
HighDistinction 80-100% |
Executive Summary (5%) | Not all elements included. | Passable summary of the report’s major purpose, analytical processes, findings recommendations. | Adequate summary of the report’s major purpose, analytical processes, findings and the Recommendations. | Reasonably comprehensive and concise summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations. | Comprehensive and concise summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations. |
Introduction (5%) | Purpose was missing or unclear. Scope unclear or absent. | You stated the purpose of the report, but not in a clear way. You indicated the scope of the report to some extent. | You stated the purpose of the report. You indicated the scope of the report generally. | You clearly stated the purpose of the report. You clearly indicated the scope of the reportwith sufficient detail. | Authorisation included.You clearly stated the purpose of the report. You clearly indicated the scope of the report with sufficient detail. Limitations included.You clearly indicated the scope of the reportwith specific detail. |
How well you justified your selection of your Target segment (10%) |
Did not meet criterion. | Your Target segment selection is justified and demonstrates some evidence that you have applied learnings from your Group’s Assignment 3 report. | Target segment selection justified and demonstrates evidence that you have applied learnings from Assign 3. Justified selection of Target Segment using the data from “Segment Attractiveness” Table. Clear explanation of why Target segment is a good opportunity to grow sales. |
Your Target segment selection is justified and demonstrates the application of your learningsfromyour Group’s Assignment 3 report. You justified your selection of Target Segment by showing further analysis of the data from your “Segment Attractiveness” Table. You provided a clear and relevantexplanation of why your selected Target segment is a good opportunity to grow sales. |
Your strong, well-informed and justifiedTarget segment selection demonstrates the application of yourlearnings from your Group’s Assignment 3 report. You justified your selection of Target Segment by showing further analysis of the data from your “Segment Attractiveness” Table. Your Report provides a clear, relevant and insightful explanationof why your selected Target segment is a good opportunity to grow sales.You explain which current and potential company strengths will be most important in developing sales to this segment. |
How well you created and justified your Brand Positioning. (20%) | Did not criterion. meet | Your Brand Positioning demonstrates you have identified a key feature of your Brand and Sub-Brand and have explained how it appeals to your target segment. |
Brand Positioning identifies a key feature of your Brand and Sub-brand. Explained how it appeals to target segment. Brand Positioning demonstrates some insight into how your Brand and Sub-Brand offers a USP compared w/competitors. |
Brand Positioning demonstrates the use of relevant literature, drawn from a range of sources.Identified a key feature of your Brand and Sub-Brand and clearly & succinctly explains how it appeals to your target segment. Brand Positioning also demonstrates originality, creativity and independent thought by offering a USP compared with the competitors. Justified USP using the relevant criteria, and included a Positioning Statement withall required elements. You included TWO Maps, with the USP on one axis on one Map. |
Demonstrates relevant literature, drawn from a range of sources. Identified key feature of your Brand and Sub-Brand and clearly and succinctly explains how it appeals to your target segment. Demonstrates originality, creativity and independent thought by offering a USP compared with the competitors. Justified USP using the relevant criteria, and included a Positioning Statement withall required elements. You included TWO Maps, with the USP on one axis on one Map. In addition to the USP, includes other highly-relevant positioning factors on the other axes. Shows all the Competitors from the Strategic Group to which your Brandand Sub-Brand belongs. |
How well your recommended Marketing Mix (the 4Ps) would implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. (35%) | Did not meet criterion. |
To implement and communicate your Brand Positioning, you have provided recommendations for each of the 4 P's (product, place, price and promotion. The recommendations are justified. |
You identify the stage on the PLC. Identify the consumers in terms of the Diffusion of Innovations. Classified your product according to Type of Consumer Product. Clear and internally-consistent recommendations for each of the 4 P's explaining why this will effectively implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. Product – the “three levels” conceptualization Place –appropriate for Type, distribution intensity, Channel structures, product display and support retailer. Promotion incl message, 3 promo tools, briefly described, explains why tools chosen. Price – recommend strategy; skim, penetrate, or status quo. Recommendations justified by logical argument. Summary Table included. |
You present data to justify your choice of stage in PLC.Diffusion of Innovations and Type as per Credit standard. All points covered for Mix as per Credit standard with all required details plus:- Product – clear linkage Conceptualization>Positioning. Place; clear linkage Type>Intensity>Structures>display & support. Promo; clear linkage IMC>Positioning. Price; strategy justified according to Intensity of Competition, and Impact of the electronic environment. All your recommendations regarding Marketing Mix are justified with reference to PLC, Diffusion of Innovation and Type of consumer product. You included the Summary Table. There is some evidence of creativity in your recommendations. |
To implement and communicate your Brand Positioningyou have provided clear, internally-consistent, relevant and very comprehensive recommendations for each of the 4 P's. All points covered for Mix as per Credit and Distinction standards with all required details, explaining why this will effectively implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. Recommendations justified regarding Marketing Mix with reference to PLC, Diffusion of Innovation and Type of consumer product as per Distinction standard. You included the Summary Table. There is strong evidence of creativity and independent thought in your recommendations. These Marketing Mix recommendations are judged very likely to succeed in growing sales of the Brand and Sub-Brand. |
Conclusion, ethics and social responsibility (10%) | Did not meet criterion. | Your Conclusion has adequately summarised how your Marketing Mix will implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. You have shown reasonably well how your Marketing Mix isinternally-consistent. Your Mix recommendation showssome creativity and independent thought. Some mention of how your recommendation are both are ethical &socially responsible. | Your Conclusion has summarised how your recommended Marketing Mix will implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. You have shown how your Marketing Mix isinternally-consistent. Your Mix recommendations show creativity and independent thought. You have adequately explained why these recommendations are both are ethical and socially responsible. |
Your Conclusion has comprehensively summarised how your recommended Marketing Mix will implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. You have shown how your Marketing Mix isinternally-consistent. Your Mix recommendations show creativity and independent thought. You have explained why these recommendations are both ethical and socially responsible. You recommend a Compliance Program which will ensure that actions by the company will be monitored to ensure they are both ethical and socially responsible. You explain how performance will be measured using Triple Bottom Line Reporting. |
Your Conclusion has succinctly, yet comprehensively summarised how your recommended Marketing Mix will implement and communicate your Brand Positioning. You have shown how your Marketing Mix isinternally-consistent. Your Mix recommendations show creativity and independent thought. You have explained why these recommendations are both ethical and socially responsible. Your Conclusion demonstrates a sophisticated analysis showing an insightful understanding of marketing strategy. You recommend a Compliance Program which will ensure that actions by the company will be monitored to ensure they are both ethical and socially responsible. You explain how performance will be measured using Triple Bottom Line Reporting. |
Presentation, format and attention to detail (5%) |
Did not meet criterion. |
The report is reasonably well organised. Acceptable standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression). |
The report is well organised and communicates ideas reasonably well. Good standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression). |
The report is well organised and communicates ideas well. High standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression). |
The report is very well structured and cohesive and communicates ideas very effectively. Excellent attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression). |
Referencing (10%) |
Did not meet criterion. |
Harvard style referencing is evident in parts of the report (in- both text referencing and references list); however, improvement in correct style and consistency is required. At least 2 Academic and at least 7 Business References cited. |
An attempt at referencing for Harvard style is evident throughout most of the report, (both in-text referencing and references list), with improvements required inconsistency.At least 2 Academic and at least 7 Business References cited. | Correct referencing for Harvard style is evident throughout most of the report (both in-text referencing and references list), with only minor corrections required. At least 2 Academic and at least 7 Business References cited. |
Correct referencing for Harvard style is evident throughout the whole report (both in-text referencing and references list). More than 10 References cited of which at least 2 are Academic and at least 7 are Business References. |