MMM132/MMMP132 ASSIGNMENT 代写

100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129

MMM132/MMMP132 ASSIGNMENT 代写
MMM132/MMMP132 ASSIGNMENT 1
Individual Business Report - Topics 1-4

Format:   BusinessReport
Word count:      3000 words (Word count excludes cover page, table of contents, reference list and any appendices)
Submission:   on-line via assignment submission box in week 8 on MMM132/MMMP132 Moodle site
Value:              40% (40 marks)

The scenario
Assumethatyouhavegraduated from Deakin Universityand havebeen short-listed fora graduateposition in either

·         the National Australia Bank (NAB)
or
·         Australian Red Cross (ARC).

Forthenextstageoftheposition selection process,youhavebeen asked toresearch and writea reportthatcritically analyses, evaluates, and reflects onspecific aspects of your chosen organisation.

1.       Describe the purpose of your chosen organisation, its mission in 2016, its profit/not-for-profit orientation, and locations. (To start, read pp. 93-94 and Table 4.1 of the Unit text)
2.       Describeone factor/condition from your chosen organisation’s generalenvironment. Analyse the impact of this factor on the organisation in 2016 and explainhow the organisation could deal with this factor. (To start, read pp. 34-37 and pp. 40-41 of the Unit text).
3.       Describe one factor/condition from your chosen organisation’s specific environment.Analyse the impact of this factor on the organisation in 2016 and explain how the organisation could deal with this factor. (To start,read pp. 34, and pp. 37-41 of the Unit text).
4.       Describe and evaluate the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and ethics of your chosen organisationwith reference to the theories on pp. 52–59 of the Unit text.
5.       Complete the personal insights quiz “What’s the Right Organisational Culture for Me?” in Chapter 2, p. 46 of the Unit text. Then report on your results from this quiz and reflect on how well you think you might fit into your chosen organisation and its organisational culture. (See pp. 42-44 and Figure 2.3 of the Unit text to guide your discussion). Refer to the quiz with an in-text citation and include the Unit text in the reference list entries.

Preparatory study

To prepare forthisassignment,complete the followingsteps:
·         Read thereportwriting informationonthe Deakin Study support site:
http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/studying/study-support/academic-skills/report-writing

·         CompleteAssignment/Tutorial/Homeworkactivities in weeks 1-5.
·         Completethe‘Personalinsight’Quiz in Chapter2 on p.46 of Unit text.
·         Carefullyresearch information aboutyourchosenorganisation.
·         Citeandreference at leastone academicjournalarticlefor each and every question 1-5 inthe report (at least 5 academic journal articles to be cited and referenced).
·         Use Deakin College AS (Academic Skills) Moodle site for information about report writing, researching, use of academic articles, referencing.
·         Consult your lecturer as needed!

MMM132/MMMP132 ASSIGNMENT 代写
Furtherinstructions

·         Use only publicly available information on this organisation.
·         As theorganisation wants to hire independent thinkers, it is keen to receive constructive criticism from you.
·         Do not contact the organisation.
·         Present your findings inthe formofawrittenreport (seebelow).http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support/academic-resources/report-writing

Business Report Format (Adapted from http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/studying/study-support/academic-skills/report-writing
Title page (notincluded in theword count)	· Titleof report - should clearlydescribewhatthe reportisabout · Nameandwebsiteoforganisation · Studentnameand IDnumber · Unitcodeand unitname
Executivesummary	Thisis a summary ofthewholereport.Outlinethetask,explaintheresearchprocessused,whatyoufound,and whatyour findingsmean intermsofyourown preferences(approx.200 words).
Table ofcontents (notincluded in theword count)	Listthe majorandminorsectionsofyourreport. Remember to use appropriate headings per section, do NOT use the question as a heading, or use the word ‘Body’.
Introduction	Setthescene;givesomebackground information aboutthereport/organisation;statetheaim/purposeof theinvestigation.Provideanoutlineof the main sectionsin thebody ofthereport(approx.100 words).
Body	Organise the body of the report into sections with clear headings for each of the five report requirements. The analysis of each question 1 to 5 (page 1) should identify the theory relating to what you investigated, what you found about the organisation, your interpretationand critical analyses of what you found, with correctly cited evidence drawn from appropriate academic textbooks and journal sources. Include at least one academic journal for each of the five sections. Each question should be answered in approximately500 words, up to a total of2500 words for this whole section of the report.
Conclusion	Summarisewhathasbeenachievedin thereport.Use theinformation fromthebody of yourreporttoidentifytheanticipated futuredirectionof theorganisation in lightof theenvironmentsdiscussed inthebody of thereport,and the‘match’betweenyou and thatorganisation ina graduaterole(approx. 200 words).
Recommendations	NOTrequired inthisassignment.
References (notincluded in theword count)	A listof allof thein-textsourcesthatyou cited in the reportusing theDeakinHarvard referencing style: http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support/referencing/harvard
Appendices[optional] (not included in the word count)	Anyinformation (graphs,charts,tables orotherdata)you used in yourreportbutdid notincludein thebody.

Refer to the marking rubric for allocation of marks for each report section.

Sourcesand references
a)      For each question from 1 – 5 of the assignment you are required to cite at least one academic journal article you have used (a minimum of five journal articles for the report). These academic journal articles are available from the Deakin University Library online databases. You can access themost appropriate databases as a Deakin College student, go to Deakin University library homepage and click ‘Deakin College’. Please check with your lecturer, or library staff if unsure.
b)      Inadditiontothe minimum fivejournalarticles above, youcan cite otheracademic references such asbooksandbook chapters.You canalso citerelevantindustry ororganisationalreportsofyourchosenorganisation.
c)      NotethatWikipedia,answers.com, mindtools.com, businessballs.com and other generalwebsites andyourorotherpersonalopinionsoropinionsofferedonsocialnetworkingwebsitesare unacceptable in academic writing.Assignments thatcite thesewebsiteswill bepenalised.
d)      NotethatlectureslidesareNOTcountedasanacademicreference.Youneedtofindtheoriginalsourcesand citethem appropriately.
e)      Forallsourcesreferredtoin-textyoumustincludefull details inyourreference list,usingtheHarvardreferencingstyleused atDeakin.Allitemsin thereferencelistmustbecited in thebody of thereport.

Businessreportwriting formatrequirements
•      MSWord document( .doc,or .docxformat; NOotherformatisaccepted)
•      Nolong paragraphs(approx.250 wordsmaximum for each paragraph)
•      Novery shortparagraphs
•      1.5spacing
•      2.5cm margins
•      TimesNewRoman/Calibri font
•      At least 11 pointfontsize
•      Numbered pages
•      Headings tohelp structurethereportand provideclearguidancetothereader

Latesubmission
Extensionsmustberequestedbeforetheduedate. Students must download the Request for Extension form from the Portal and submit this, together with supporting documentation, to the Unit Coordinator on helene.strawbridge@deakin.edu.au.Extensionscanbegrantedfordocumentedseriousillnessorforcompassionatereasonsunderextenuatingcircumstances.Theunitcoordinatorcanasktoseehowmuchworkhasbeencompletedbeforegrantinganextension.Allextension applicationsmustbesenttotheUnitCoordinatorbeforetheduedate.

Assignments submitted 7 or more days after the due date will not be assessed unless an extension has been granted by the Unit Coordinator.

You arestronglyencouragedto startearlyandto continuallybackupyourassignmentasyou progress.Computercrashesor corruptedfileswillNOTbeacceptedasvalid reasonsforan extensionof anylength of time.

For furtherinformation aboutapplications for Extensions, or SpecialConsideration,check Deakin College Portal.

Penaltiesforlatesubmission
Assignmentsorotherassessmenttasksconducted during thetrimestersubmitted latewithoutanextension being granted willbepenalised at the rate of 10% of the marks, per day. Assignments submitted more than 7 days late will not be assessed unless an extension has been granted.Theselate assignments willbeheld untilfinalgradingand may betakenintoconsideration in a Pass/Failsituation.

Turnitin
Studentsarestronglyrecommended to checkoriginalitythrough Turnitinpriortosubmitting thefinalassessment. You will submit your assignment on Moodle through Turnitin so uploading early will allow you to make any changes if needed. Please check with your lecturer if you require further information about Turnitin.

Citing and Referencing
YoumustcorrectlyusetheHarvardstyle ofreferencing used atDeakin inthisassessment.

Academic Integrity, Plagiarismand Collusion
Plagiarismand collusion, and contract cheatingconstituteextremely seriousbreachesof academicintegrity.Theyareformsof cheating,and severepenaltiesareassociated withthem,including cancellation ofmarksforaspecificassignment,fora specificunitor evenexclusion from thecourse.Ifyouareeverindoubtabouthowtoproperlyuseand citeasourceof information,consultyourlecturerortheAcademic Skills Moodle Site.

·         Plagiarism occurswhen astudentpassesoffasthestudent’sown work,or copieswithoutacknowledgementastoitsauthorship,theworkofanyotherpersonor resubmitstheirownworkfrom a previousassessmenttask.
·         Collusionoccurswhen a studentobtainstheagreementof anotherperson for a fraudulentpurpose,with theintentofobtaining an advantagein submitting an assignmentorotherwork.
·         Contract cheating occurs when a student engages another to write parts of, or all, of a submitted piece of assessment

Can I recycle myownwork?
DeakinCollege studentsarenotpermitted torecycletheirassessmentwork,or partsofassessmentwork,withouttheapproval of theunitcoordinatoroftheircurrentunit.Thisincludesworksubmitted forassessmentatanotheracademicinstitution.Ifstudentswishto reuseorextendparts ofpreviouslysubmitted work,then they should discussthiswiththeunitcoordinatorpriortothesubmission date.
Depending onthenatureofthetask,theunit coordinatormaypermitor declinetherequest.

Assignment submission
Youmustkeep a backupcopyofevery assignmentyou submit,untilthemarked assignmenthasbeen returned toyou.Intheunlikely eventthatoneof yourassignmentsismisplaced,you willneedtosubmityourbackup copy.
Anyworkyousubmitmay bechecked by electronicorothermeansforthepurposesof detectingcollusionand/orplagiarism.

After submission of your assignment to the Moodle site, check that your assignment has uploaded. The upload check is your responsibility.

MMM132 Assignment Marking Rubric: Report (40% - 40 marks)

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

YET TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM STANDARD

MEETS STANDARD

EXCEEDS STANDARD

No/poor attempt

Needs improvement

Satisfactory

Good

Very good

Excellent

Report structure, organisation and logical flow, including Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Introduction and Conclusion

ULO2(Max 5marks)

0.7

Poor attempt

0-1.4

2

Does not follow the required report structure/format.
Report is disjointed and fragmented.

1.5-2.4

2.7

An attempt is made to follow the required report structure and format.Report lacks flow and is somewhat disjointed and fragmented.

2.5-2.9

3.2

A good attempt is made to follow the required report structure and format.Report flows quite well, but is disjointed or fragmented in places.
3-3.4

3.7

A very good attempt is made to follow the required report structure and format.
Report has a logical flow.

3.5-3.9

5

Excellent use of the required report structure and format.
Report has a logical flow and coherent line of argument.

4-5

Description and analysis of Q1 relevant to the organisation

ULO1

(Max 4 marks)

0.6

The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.

0-1.1

1.6

The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to an appropriate journal article. Some context is provided but may be unclear.

1.2-1.9

2.2

The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are described without ambiguityand refers to a suitable journal article,but is not discussed. Some context provided.
2-2.3

2.6

The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are clearly identified,refers to a suitable journal article that is somewhat explained, is without ambiguity and in context.

2.4-2.7

3

The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this questionare clearly identified and described well, with relevant information,suitable journal articles, and argument where necessary for understanding. The context and the background are explained.
2.8-3.1

4

The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, suitable journal articles are used, deliver all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and the background are well explained.3.2-4

Description and analysis of Q2 relevant to the organisation.

ULOs 1 & 3

(Max 7 marks)

1

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question arenot clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.

Paraphrases or summarises information rather than providing an analysis. Does not identify components of the theory, does not distinguish the relevant from irrelevant details.

0-2

2.8

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article.Some context is provided but may be unclear.

Paraphrases or summarises information with very little analysis. Inconsistently identifies components of the theories and incorrectly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details

2.1-3.4

3.8

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.
Some context provided.

Demonstrates the ability to analyse information to a rudimentary level. Identifies components of the theories, mostly distinguishing relevant from irrelevant details.

3.5-4.1

4.5

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguityand in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.

A fair analysis of information, clearly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.

4.2-4.8

5.2

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal articles are used.

A robust analysis of information consistently identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.

4.9-5.5

7

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained and suitable journal articles are used.
A thorough analysis of information, thoroughly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately and thoroughly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.
5.6-7

Description and analysis of Q3 relevant to the organisation

ULOs 1 & 3

(Max 7 marks)

1

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.

Paraphrases or summarises information rather than providing an analysis. Does not identify components of the theory, and does not distinguish the relevant from irrelevant details.

0-2

2.8

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article. Some context is provided but may be unclear.

Paraphrases or summarises information with very little analysis. Inconsistently identifies components of the theories and incorrectly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.

2.1-3.4

3.8

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.
Some context provided.

Demonstrates the ability to analysis information to a rudimentary level.Identifies components of the theories; mostly distinguishing relevant from irrelevant details.

3.5-4.1

4.5

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguity and in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.

A fair analysis of information, clearly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.

4.2-4.8

5.2

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal articles are used.

A robust analysis of information, consistently identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.

4.9-5.5

7

The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explainedand suitable journal articles are used.
A thorough analysis of information, thoroughly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately and thoroughly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.

5.6-7

Description and evaluation of Q4 relevant to the organisation

ULOs 1 & 3

(Max 7 marks)

1

The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.

No evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice or discussion of relevant theory.

0-2

2.8

The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article. Some context is provided but may be unclear.

Limited evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice or discussion of relevant theory provided.

2.1-3.4

3.8 The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.

Some context provided.

Satisfactory evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and some discussion of relevant theory.

3.5-4.1

4.5

The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguity and in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.

Accurate evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and detailed discussion of relevant theory.

4.2-4.8

5.2

The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal articles are used.

Robust evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and comprehensive discussion of relevant theory.

4.9-5.5

7

The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained and suitable journals are used.

Thorough evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and excellent discussion of relevant theory.

5.6-7

Description and evaluation of Q5 relevant to the organisation

ULOs 1 & 3

(Max 7 marks)

1

The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.

Reflection does not demonstrate clear reasoning and does not provide discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation

0-2

2.8

The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article. . Some context is provided but may be unclear.

Reflection demonstrates minimal clear reasoning and provides very basic discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.

2.1-3.4

3.8

The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.
Some context provided.

Reflection demonstrates satisfactory clear reasoning and provides reasonable discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.

3.5-4.1

4.5

The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguity and in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.

Reflection demonstrates clearand consistent reasoning and provides detailed discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.

4.2-4.8

5.2

The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal articles are used.
Reflection demonstrates clear, consistent and detailed reasoning and provides high-level discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.

4.9-5.5

7

The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained; suitable journal articles are used.

Reflection demonstratesconsistentand systematic reasoning and provides thorough discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.

5.6-7

Quality of language and ability to communicate information accurately using academic style

(Max 3 marks)

0.4

Writing filled with grammatical and spelling errors. English expression is difficult to understand. Little or no use of paraphrasing, with a heavy reliance on quotes. In-text citations and referencing have not been used or do not conform to Harvard standard

0-0.8

1.2

Many grammatical and spelling errors. English expression is difficult to understand, but meaning can be made of what is written.
Little effort has been put into paraphrasing of material.
In-text citations not utilised or inaccurate.
List of references does not follow the Harvard referencing style correctly.

0.9-1.4

1.6

Expresses thoughts meaningfully, even though there may be occasional errors.
Paraphrasing uses too many of the author’s own words.
In-text citations are too sparse and/or mostly inaccurate.
Some attempt to present a list of references following the Harvard referencing style, but may have several errors.

1.5-1.7

1.9

Expresses thoughts meaningfully, even though there may be occasional errors.
Paraphrasing portrays the ideas of others in student’s own words.
In-text citations are accurate in most cases and are just adequate to the task.
List of references presented using the Harvard referencing style accurately in most cases.
1.8-2

2.2

Communicates meaning with clarity and fluency. Writing is almost error-free.
Paraphrasing correctly portrays the ideas of others in student’s own words.
In-text citations are accurate and support the arguments made in the assignment quite well.
List of references presented accurately using the Harvard referencing style.

2.1-2.3

3

Skilfully communicates meaning with high level of clarity and fluency. Writing is virtually error-free.
Paraphrasing correctly portrays the ideas of others in student’s own words.
In-text citations are accurate and support the arguments made in the assignment very well.
List of references presented very accurately using the Harvard style.

2.4-3

MMM132/MMMP132 ASSIGNMENT 代写